chocolatepot: Ed and Stede (Default)
Enchanted ([personal profile] chocolatepot) wrote2015-06-17 06:22 pm

For real??

I want to say something sarcastic, but I'm kind of too frustrated: someone on FB asked a question about bodiced petticoats, had a short exchange with someone else regarding bust support, and said she trusted a particular blog post that said the "divorce" look didn't come in until the late 1810s (written by a blogger who is great but doesn't specialize in that era at all). I responded with a very polite correction of the post, and she posted "I trust her 100%" and deleted the whole thread!

It's your prerogative to believe who you want to believe, but trust me, 18th century-style stays didn't come back in fashion in the 1800s and the long corset wasn't invented in 1817. I don't think pointing that out should be grounds for deleting my comment, but hey, you do you.
lliira: Fang from FF13 (Default)

[personal profile] lliira 2015-06-18 01:34 am (UTC)(link)
Ugh, that would bug me too. People who take any kind of disagreement as condemnation and therefore can't handle it are so frustrating.

Tangent, if you have time: what's the "divorce" look?
lliira: Fang from FF13 (Default)

[personal profile] lliira 2015-06-19 08:19 am (UTC)(link)
Thanks!

Ugh, I've been trying to research fashion in the last quarter of the eighteenth century for half a year (off and on), and this is the first time I have seen the term "cone-stays". Everyone only seems to want to talk about Regency and later stuff, unless they're talking about princesses.