chocolatepot: Ed and Stede (Our Flag Means Death)
[personal profile] chocolatepot
Me a month ago: I think I'm done with historical sewing, it just doesn't do it for me anymore and I can't maintain the stamina to finish a whole outfit.

Me now: I'M GONNA SEW A HISTORICALLY ACCURATE WOMAN'S OUTFIT BASED ON STEDE'S TURQUOISE SUIT!

Shift - I started making a new shift at some point in the last seven-five years I guess? It's all put together but needs some felling, hemming, cuffs, and the neckline cut out. Perfect. The sleeves are a bit tight because my arms have gotten a bit fatter, which isn't great, and I'm pretty sure they're really 1770s-1780s sleeves, but I don't much feel like altering them, so they'll have to do. (THE COMPROMISES BEGIN.)

Stays - Why do we basically only have turn of the century court bodice stays and then 1740s-on proper underwear stays for patterns? I'm torn between the stomacher stays in C&C and the front-lacing 1740s(?) stays in PoF5, but honestly the problem with both is that I'd really like to make them out of a green brocade and go stomacherless because that's one of the things I find really cool about early 18th century dress. Because of that I'd really love to do these at the MFAB, but they seem sooo much more complicated, especially with the rounded point. Lots of layers. But I'm psyched to try out some of this new research about shaping and paper and whatnot, and the curved lines scaling-up thing.

Gown - XIV in Waugh, I think? Same problem, so much court dress pre-1740s, but in all honesty XIV looks earlier than it's dated to me, at least by Waugh's cartoon. Turquoise (poly) satin with gold braid trim.

Shoes - My Fugawees with pretty white ribbon! I haven't worn them in so long. Not that I know where I will wear all of this but I will come up with something.

Date: 2022-08-31 01:27 pm (UTC)
danabren: DC17 (Default)
From: [personal profile] danabren
Not that I know where I will wear all of this

ho ho ho ho ho sob same

Date: 2022-08-31 10:03 pm (UTC)
mala_14: (Default)
From: [personal profile] mala_14
Brains are silly. This sounds fun! I also have the same question about 1740 stays. Maybe there are a lot that are mis-dated, since mid-18th century stays are all pretty similar, maybe like lots of those 1760s ones are actually 1740s or 1750s.

Date: 2022-09-01 04:43 pm (UTC)
totchipanda: (Default)
From: [personal profile] totchipanda
I FULLY SUPPORT THIS DECISION and I can't wait to read about the project! :D

Date: 2022-09-02 02:45 am (UTC)
mala_14: (Default)
From: [personal profile] mala_14
True. And I think it's tough to see small differences when the garment isn't also shaping the body it was made for. Also, I wonder how long people wore these stays for. Like would you pick a style in 1740 and keep wearing that for the next 15 years? How quickly did they wear out? So many questions!

Date: 2022-09-02 12:19 pm (UTC)
danabren: DC17 (Default)
From: [personal profile] danabren
And anyone who DOES know the difference should be someone you know!

Date: 2022-09-08 08:39 pm (UTC)
totchipanda: (OMFG YES!Toph)
From: [personal profile] totchipanda
I have a saved post from tumblr about how I am an ENABLER first and a friend second (if we include "mutuals on dw" as friends), which I really should put in my bio because no one should ever come to me to make them not do something they really want to do :D

Profile

chocolatepot: Ed and Stede (Default)
Enchanted

January 2026

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Style Credit

Page generated Feb. 25th, 2026 03:09 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios

Active Entries

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags

Most Popular Tags