Pattern

Dec. 5th, 2012 07:43 pm
chocolatepot: Ed and Stede (Default)
You should be able to see it here. Those three Xes on the side are where the teardrop shapes attach, and the one on the bottom (which should also be on the back piece) is where the side of the bottom one is. Let's see ... and the Xes on the back neckline are where these 1" wide straps attach, the top end of one and the bottom of the other. There's a lot of sequinage, but I only marked out where the wide band is towards the bottom on the front.

So, what do you think? If I make it in a pale color and stick a train on the shoulders, will it pass for court dress?
chocolatepot: Ed and Stede (Default)
Four of my magazines arrived today, and I don't care as much about how much I spent! They're worth it. The Delineator is really thick. Haven't checked all of them, but one or two pictures are cut out of a couple - usually not fashion plates, oddly. But they're really excellent and I'm looking forward to just sitting down and getting to read them straight through.

Had the brilliant idea this morning of creating Galerie des Modes pages with all the images, so that I can load them on the laptop at work and do some translation in my breaks. There are a few online resources I use while I'm working on them that I can't get at, but I can at least get most of the text and mark whatever it is that I need to look up.

NaNo is ... sticking. Part of the problem is that I find pacing very difficult to check on while writing; I won't know until afterward if I'm moving at a decent clip or if this book actually needs to be 100k words or what. But a larger problem, I think, is that I want to do translations and read 1920s magazines and not so much write. IDK, maybe it's just been a while since I last did NaNo and I don't remember how difficult it was for me other years.

I really really need to sew, or at least get things lined up so I can sew after NaNo's done. I need to make concrete plans, pick out patterns to use/alter, and buy fabric. I can do this! I might not even make a corselet, just get a sports bra or maybe a bandeau bra. If I go earlier 1920s I can get away with having more of a shape and making something that will actually look decent on me.

TGIF

Oct. 26th, 2012 08:05 pm
chocolatepot: Ed and Stede (Default)
The one thing I hate about Pinterest (and Tumblr) is that the repins aren't attached to the original. I see the benefit to keeping them static as of the time of repinning/reblogging and not allowing other people to basically alter posts on your own board/blog, but I always end up editing mine for dates and then I'm annoyed that inaccurate dates are now on other people's things under my name. THAT DRESS IS 1924 NOT 1923, OH NO.

I would like to see Ruby Bentall play a main character. I like that The Paradise is less lessony than Lark Rise, but she's basically playing the same character only slightly less stupid. Matthew McNulty is so hot, but he's NOT IN IT ENOUGH and I resent that. ETA: the costumes are actually terrible in this, though. Elaine Cassidy's look cheap and the shopgirls' are too 1880s.

Someone posted Hook/Aurora gifs in Tumblr and now I ship it. I don't know why I'm so suggestible.

I think the way I'm doing this ppt is to have each slide with a fashion plate and an extant dress/ensemble from the same year that shows the basic points of the dress in the plate. I think I'm going to try to find more casual photos to work in as well. It's going to be a combination of fashion history mythbuster, dating tutorial [insert joke here], and I guess I'd call it hints on being more accurate/using more variations. So everyone gets something! Not many people seem to really do the 1920s, I think because all you tend to see is robes de style or waistless tubes with straps. So I want to show the blousing and the faux-sashes and the gathering to one side and the long skirts. I'm not sure how many people would necessarily be interested specifically for the purpose of dating, but given how many museum dates for the '20s seem like someone just threw a dart at a timeline it'd probably be useful. I'm not planning to spend much time on the mythbusting specifically - just showing all these examples will basically do it.

This nail polish does not want to come off. It's a light color so I thought it would be easier, for some reason, but it's really sticking. I'm going to try working at it again tomorrow.

:I

Oct. 21st, 2012 09:28 pm
chocolatepot: Ed and Stede (Default)
The computer spent about a day and a half finding and importing files from the external, but then it turned out that it imported RAW files, which means that basically it crammed them into files with weird dates (like the 1940s and such) that can't be opened by anything. So I changed the option and now we're doing it all over again.

Okay, so. I need to finish hemming the demi-polonaise, make a bum pad, re-do the front pleats after it turn out that the pad shortens the back too much, and plan out a 1920s court dress and day outfit. Because I'm going to do events! I'm going to wear the court dress to the formal dinner and Jampagne, the day dress for my 1920s class (and whatever else happens that day, probs), the demi-polonaise for the crepe breakfast, and thesis dress for most everything else. On the one hand, given my work rate this is a steep order, but 1920s is fairly simple and at least won't offer too many tricky problems (and I can do it on the machine without ~losing my integrity~). Court dress would need silk, but everything else could be cheaper fabric. Cross your fingers for me and wish me luck.
chocolatepot: Ed and Stede (Default)
I'm thinking of doing the curtain-along ... for a demi-polonaise! I'll probably feel like a chump because everyone else is doing proper dresses, but it would be pretty cool and not stressful. Because I wouldn't need to do bodice stuff, I could play around with cool trim. And it would need a mantelet, but they are not exactly difficult to fit.

Pictures: here, here, and here.

It's kind of the lazy option, but it has the advantage of novelty.
chocolatepot: Ed and Stede (Default)
So one of the fashion plates whose description I translated days ago and is I think the next after the next to be posted is fascinating me endlessly. Basically, you wear a petticoat with a bit of a polonaise stuck to the back, and throw a mantelet over your stays so it looks like you're fully dressed.

It's the eighteenth century version of putting your coat on over your bra to go out and get the paper.

(Also, it's taken me days but I think I've figured out that manchette is the period term for engageante, and now everything is clear.)

(I really need to get a job.)

ETA: Going to make one of these for DU2013, I think. It sounds about my speed! Also, given that it has no bodice, I'm dozens of times less likely to spend time and money making it and then never wear it again because it doesn't fit right. A reusable costume, imagine!
chocolatepot: Ed and Stede (Default)
I actually left last night after [profile] tayloropolis and Julie's "Telling the Mistress from the Maid" presentation - got home around midnight and went straight to bed. It felt very nice to be back, after my troubles!

(I'm such a dork, on Saturday I went to Julie's presentation on period fabrics and didn't recognize her. I thought she seemed a bit familiar but figured I'd seen her costuming blog or something. After I realized that had been her I understood why I'd felt like I already knew most of what was in her first presentation - of course, we learned it from the same person!)

When everyone else was at the tea party I wandered around the dealer's room. Almost bought The Queen's Servants but decided I was really unlikely to sew any early early Tudor stuff, so I didn't. But at ... a booth (I don't think I picked up their card and now I feel a bit stupid) I did get a very plain 8" hatpin, which I REALLY needed, and a little bag of Amish hairpins, 3" long, which are fantastic. I'm using two to keep up all of my hair right now, I highly recommend them.

While I was sitting in the lobby, reading my 1902 McCall's Magazine, I couldn't help but overhear another attendee on the phone, and I felt so bad for her. I had some troubles with accommodations, but all the classes she wanted to go to had been canceled, and ugh. That must have sucked so much.

I have some pictures I'm going to put up on Blogger. Some of others, some of me. I look great in the ones of me, you should see them. Also, I am in costume! (Look under cut for mysterious details.)

classes I went to )

Thoughts for next year - definitely stay at wherever it's being held, definitely go to at least two events, definitely make something to wear. It's not on purpose but it always felt a little bit like there was a clear curtain between the people in costume and the people not; partially, I think, because the people who were dressed up knew each other well and those of us not dressed up were newer to the field, but it's also hard to just start chatting about nothing to someone in an amazing Edwardian/Regency/medieval outfit. It's much easier to turn to someone dressed unobtrusively and be like, "hey, it's cold in here, isn't it?"

Also, definitely go to one of SAB's classes. But don't remind her I wrote that babbly email to her after she wrote one to me after that 18cLife fight.

Okay

Jun. 2nd, 2012 08:59 pm
chocolatepot: Ed and Stede (Default)
I had a ... minor breakdown in the car after dinner. See, when I went out looking for a cheap lunch today the GPS kept taking me to the stupidest places. I'd use it to browse for food and pick out a likely-sounding diner or café, and it would take me to the middle of a business park. It did this twice for both meals, and each time I finally went "FINE I CAN SEE A PLACE TO EAT I'LL JUST MAKE A BIG CIRCLE AND PULL IN THERE." After I had dinner I called Dad and kind of started crying into the phone, because of that and because I'd tried to call him earlier and he hadn't been there or something, basically I was pretty tired due to having not slept much at all the night before. But with Dad's help I found a nearby Homestead hotel - where they have toothpaste at the desk and breakfast in the morning - and checked in there, and now I am chill.

Today I did meet [profile] tayloropolis and [personal profile] jennil (and, er, may have poked [personal profile] mandie_rw in the head with a hanger?) and was only moderately awkward. Saying "chocolatepot" out loud is inherently awkward. I need to make up some nice business cards with my email address and blog URL. I kind of want to do a class next year - not a practical one, my practical skills aren't much to speak of, but my theory is pretty good.

This Lifetime movie stars Gretchen Wiener. Her hair's so big because it's full of invisible friends.

Yesterday

Jun. 2nd, 2012 02:17 pm
chocolatepot: Ed and Stede (Default)
Written last night when I had no internet )

---

Today I am much less bouncy. It was a rough night, there was too much light in the room and the AC was very loud, so there was that. I checked out and don't know what I'll be doing tonight - I don't feel like calling Alex and so I suspect I'll just find another cheap motel.

I'm not sure if I've seen anyone I know. I think I saw [personal profile] mandie_rw but wasn't aware you were wearing that, and same with [personal profile] jennil in a high-waisted corselet post-Edwardian skirt. I'm being a bit awkward and have talked to a couple of other not-in-costume people ... perhaps I will be more social next year, when I'm in a proper outfit myself and also don't feel like a vagrant due to lack of living situation. Dad suggested I look into booking into the Sheraton where the con is, but $209 is the cheapest they go. Ugh. Well, better look for a drugstore to buy toothpaste at before I get back so I can be marginally more hygienic.
chocolatepot: Ed and Stede (Default)
So, I think my schedule for Dress U is going to be:

Saturday: Survival of the Fittest (most important of all, for reals); Lazarus Dress; Taming the Stash; lunch; Dressing for the Titanic; The Dark Dress of Tim Burton; Late 16th/Early 17th Century Embroidered Jackets

Sunday: Characteristics of Civil War Era Fashion; Telling the Mistress from the Maid; Good Movie, Bad Costume

I haven't decided what I'm doing on Sunday morning, it's tough to pick when nothing is the absolute MUST MUST MUST like some of the classes. Part of me wants to do the extant gowns class, but part of me thinks I can see extant gowns pretty much any time I want, I ought to learn how to use the fashion-mag patterns instead.

You'll notice I'm not doing any events - next year I will, once I've met people IRL and it's more comfortable (and once I have a stable of costumes to make a good showing with, ha). I know my limitations when it comes to social events, I want to be sure I'm not going to sit in a corner before I pay $30 to do it.

---

So I've been watching Cake Boss lately on Netflix and it's awesome? I always thought it was more about drama but no, it's just making awesome cakes. My mom should get Netflix, she'd love this.

---

I got a (free?) book on Amazon called The Five Sons of Charlie Gisby. It's essentially a genealogical research paper, and it's fairly good - I didn't expect to enjoy it that much, to be honest, but it does illustrate the time period and place well, I think. It's making me want to write a research paper on Ruth, Ella, and Mertis, although I think Margate is a better place to be researching than Susquehanna County, PA.

---

I love the free promotions on Amazon. I also just read Wallflower, the first book in the Old Maids Series, by Catherine Gayle. Well, the fact that I finished it when I normally heave gusty sighs and delete/return romance novels these days should say it all. It's not on par with the Duchesses series (THE DUCHESSES ARE THE BEST) and there were some significantly ????? moments, but these were balanced out by the awesome climax.

review )

---

Two links:

Fantastic Voyage, on Community and Doctor Who.

The Mommy Wars Redux: A False Conflict, on "stop framing the issue about working vs. ubermothering as being a fight between women, the problem is the patriarchal society that makes the conflict exist you idiots."
chocolatepot: Ed and Stede (Default)
Tomorrow I'm going to do a blog post that touches on specific things I've been doing in my internship and museum cataloguing in general, but for now I am too tired. So it will suffice to say that I saw some dolls that were creepy (the headless leather bodies, the otherwise nice but eyeless girl doll) and some dolls that were just depressing because their clothes were deteriorated. Made me think of you, Jennil!

I have to ask for Friday and Monday off for Dress U driving. :/ I hate asking for time off, and it's tempting me to skive off Dress U and I paid $85 for it, I'm not going to just not go but since this Monday is a holiday I'm all, "oh, I can't ask for more time off." So annoying, my brain and my anxieties. I'm feeling a lot more chill about my issues lately, though. My internship is pretty much the embodiment of my issues - I catalogue things, fitting everything neatly into a category and sub-category, sitting in a room full of artifacts by myself with no human contact except when it's necessary. And I love it. So yeah.
chocolatepot: Ed and Stede (Default)
I've gotten used to ads claiming that "a single mom has discovered a simple trick to a flat belly" or to paying less for car insurance, and of course "doctors hate her" for coming up with a magical wrinkle-reducer, but there's something funny about this one.



Finally finished cataloguing all of the dresses; moved on and did corsets, chemises/shifts, and undergarments. Sadly, the AIHA doesn't have many corsets, but there are a couple. I'm planning a fifth book now on undergarments (and maybe nightclothes as well). I'd especially like to see the Ferris "Good Sense" corset waist, which is advertised as being for bicycling and athletic pursuits. There's a mid-18th century shift, too, which I did peek at one day when I was in the collections. And there are drawers from all through the 19th century, even black silk ones I need to see. Can't wait to see what's at the Chapman.

I'm not sure if I'm going to dress up for Dress U. I mean, I get the impression that nearly everyone dresses up at Costume College, but that's just because I follow serious costumers, right? Surely there are plenty of people in modern dress that just don't get their pictures taken for obvious reasons? I mean, I have no idea how I'm going to do socially (though I suspect "pretty badly" is the right answer here) so I'd at least rather be sitting in the corner by myself in inconspicuous clothing than, say, swathed in a big white sheet (ie my thesis project). My gown has been coming along well, though, so I could see breaking to finish my 1911 corset. I should look at my lingerie dresses again and figure out which one I want to take the pattern of and make. I am leaning toward my great-grandmother's graduation dress minus the embroidery, although it's seven or eight years more modern than the corset, just because it'd be cool to bring the photograph of her in it with me.

Speaking of my great-grandmother, I mentioned on ffa that I would never name a child after her (Ardis); someone suggested I use it for a middle name and give my daughter a first name that starts with T, and I am seriously considering this. Is wanting a baby I could call Tardis such a bad thing, really?

Profile

chocolatepot: Ed and Stede (Default)
Enchanted

May 2025

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314 151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Style Credit

Syndicate

RSS Atom
Page generated May. 26th, 2025 04:01 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags

Most Popular Tags